Marvell vs Carnegie Mellon
The verdict:
CMU wins $750 million from Marvell. However The university expects to receive about $250 million from the settlement after legal fees and related costs. A significantly less amount than the headlines state.Patents in Litigation
- No. 6,201,839: “Method and Apparatus for Correlation-Sensitive Adaptive Sequence Detection”
- No. 6,438,180: "Soft and Hard Sequence Detection in ISI Memory Channels.”
In conclusion, Marvell owes CMU a significant chunk of money. This would be a windfall for the university, which would help boost student services according to school officials. Interestingly, the case went to the District Court of Pennsylvania and the Federal Circuit Appeals court, until finally reaching an amount.
Source:
http://www.pcworld.com/article/3034719/marvell-carnegie-mellon-settle-patent-dispute-over-hard-drive-chips.html
Hey Jaskirat!
ReplyDeleteI really liked your presentation of this case! You did a great job summarizing the key facts of the topic, while also keeping it short and concise. Thus, it made it really easy to digest. I definitely recommend that you apply this same methodology to next week's assignments, as it definitely works well!
Best,
Chris
Hi Jaskirat,
ReplyDeleteGreat post! I also did a post on CMU vs. Marvell. I enjoyed how you listed the patents that were in question during the case. However, I think you missed out on the point that CMU will give most of the proceedings from the settlement to the investors of the patents.
Once again, great post!